The dialogue of cultures: theoretical and practical features of cultural production

UDC 321.911(477)

Oleksandra Oliinyk

Institute for Cultural Research, National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv.

ORCID 0000-0002-2392-3938

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-21-2022-1.24-33

Keywords: cultural product, cultural diplomacy, dialogue of cultures, cultural industries, cultural space.

Abstract. In this article the cultural product is understood in two contexts. According to the first one it is perceived as a result of cultural production, which depends on the characteristics of cultural work and communication between the producer and the audience, ie the peculiarities of the consumption of cultural products. According to the second approach it is a tool for cultural dialogue and cultural diplomacy. Thus, the logic of presenting the theses is intended to analyze three main aspects: cultural work (its specific features, the level of understanding and perception), cultural consumption (dialogue of the artist with the audience, ethics of art production), features of the ecosystem of cultural production of Ukraine. The necessity to legitimize the cultural economics (an inherent component of cultural space) as a subject of research focuses on three main tasks: first, to create an appropriate ecosystem for cultural development (from training to clear financial terms, the status of cultural production in society and economy); secondly, to reproduce the laws of social relations in cultural production (from working conditions and the status of artists to dialogue with the audience or the consumption of cultural products) and thirdly, to implement the strategies for the development of culture and cultural industries. This justifies the relevance of the given topic for research, aimed to analyze the importance of the economic component of cultural production for the concept of cultural dialogue.

Author Biography.

Oleksandra Oliinyk, Ph.D. (Cultural Studies), head of the department of theory and history of culture, Institute for Cultural Research, National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv.
aleksandra.oley@gmail.com

References:

Abbing, H. (2002). Why Are Artists Poor? The Exceptional Economy of the Arts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 369 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048503650

Cowen, Tyler (1998). In Praise of Commercial Culture. Harvard University Press.

Grytsenko, Oleksandr. (2019). Kulturnyi prostir i natsionalna kultura: teoretychne osmyslennia ta praktychne formuvannia: monohrafiia [Cultural space and national culture: theoretical understanding and practical formation: a monograph]. Kyiv: Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine. 256 p. (in Ukrainian)

Hromliuk, I., & Struk, A. (2021a, March). Koly mystetstvo zarobliaie. Yak kreatyvni industrii v Ukraini mozhut staty potuzhnoiu ekonomichnoiu syloiu [When art makes money. How creative industries in Ukraine can become a powerful economic force]. Retrieved from https://theukrainians.org/koly-mystetstvo-zarobliaie/ (in Ukrainian)

Hromliuk, I., & Struk, A. (2021b, July). Stvoryty tsinnist dlia krainy ta svitu: shcho maiut znaty kreatyvni pidpryiemtsi, yaki khochut pidibraty vdalu biznes-model [Create value for the country and the world: what creative entrepreneurs who want to find a successful business model should know]. Retrieved from https://theukrainians.org/stvoryty-tsinnist/?fbclid=IwAR0rXtlEb7s5OycjcI2eJWNIflXUshNPPTrGoSe09GyhsLqlNEv0zul7Y5w (in Ukrainian)

Husiev, I. (2020a). Analitychnyi zvit spryiniattia Ukrainy za kordonom: Frantsiia [Analytical report on the perception of Ukraine abroad: France]. N. Koval, & M. Irysova (Eds). Ukrainskyi  instytut. Retrieved from https://ui.org.ua/ukraine-abroad-research/#rec321922949 (in Ukrainian)

Husiev, I. (2020b). Analitychnyi zvit spryiniattia Ukrainy za kordonom: Nimechchyna [Analytical report on the perception of Ukraine abroad: Germany]. N. Koval, & M. Irysova (Eds). Ukrainskyi  instytut.  Retrieved from https://ui.org.ua/ukraine-abroad-research/#rec321983641 (in Ukrainian)

Jakovlev, V. (2017). Osnovanija kul’turnyh i kreativnyh industrij kak javlenija sovremennogo obshhestva [The foundations of cultural and creative industries as a phenomenon of modern society]. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul’tury, (1 (26)), 14–27. (in Russian)

Jones, Alan, & de Coppet, Laura . (1984). The Art Dealers. NY Clarkson N. Potter. 322 p.

Kalnytskyi, E. A. (2016). Materialni dominanty v konteksti kryzy suchasnoho suspilstva [Material dominants in the context of the crisis of modern society]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Iurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho».  Series: Philosophy. No1. P. 49–57. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnyua_2016_1_7 (in Ukrainian)

Koshelev, Egor. (No date). O tvorcheskoy etike i hudozhestvennom proizvodstve [About creative ethics and artistic production]. Retrieved from http://xz.gif.ru/numbers/79-80/koshelev/ (in Russian)

Kreatyvna dyrektorka Ukrainskoho instytutu Tetiana Filevska pro tsili ta zavdannia instytutu ta kreatyvni shliakhy yikh dosiahnennia [Creative Director of the Ukrainian Institute Tetyana Filevska about the goals and objectives of the Institute and creative ways to achieve them]. (No date). Retrieved from https://creativity.ua/life-and-culture/kreatyvna-dyrektorka-ukrainskoho-instytutu-tetiana-filevska-pro-tsili-ta-zavdannia-instytutu-ta-kreatyvni-shliakhy-ikh-dosiahnennia/ (in Ukrainian)

Krivolap, Aleksej Dmitrievich. (2017). Kreativnye industrii kak drozhzhi dlya «brozheniya» kul’turnoy identichnosti [Creative industries as a yeast to ferment cultural identity]. Mezhdunarodniy zhurnal issledovaniy kul’tury, (1 (26)), 49–57. (in Russian)

López Cuenca, Alberto. (2012). Artistic Labour, Enclosure and the New Economy. After all. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/667241

Oliinyk, O. (2014). Rynok pratsi yak osoblyvyi sehment sfery kultury [The labor market as a special segment of culture]. Kulturolohichna dumka=The Culturology Ideas, 7. Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine. P. 161–166. (in Ukrainian)

Serafini, Paula, & Banks, Mark. (2020). Living Precarious Lives? Time and Temporality in Visual Arts Careers. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research. Vol. 12 No. 2: Independent Articles. P. 351–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.20200504a

Tarnovskii, V. (2018). Economy of culture and culture of economy: institutional aspect. Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies.

Vishmidt, Marina. (2018). “Anomaly and Autonomy: On the Currency of the Exception in the Value Relations of Contemporary Art”. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 588–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zkg-2018-0043

W.A.G.E. (No date). Working artists and the greater economy. Retrieved from https://wageforwork.com/home#top

Wang, J. (2016). Classical Music: A Norm of Common” Culture Embedded in Cultural Consumption and Cultural Diversity. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 47(2), 195–205. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/44234969

Zamorano, Mariano Martín (2016). “Reframing Cultural Diplomacy: The Instrumentalization of Culture under the Soft Power Theory”, Culture Unbound, volume 8, 166–186. Published by Linköping University Electronic Press. Retrieved from http://www.cultureunbound.ep.liu.se DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1608165

PDF (Ukrainian)

Published:

Vol 21 No 1 (2022).

Section: THEORY AND HISTORY OF CULTURE.