Game TV Series as a Specific Form of Public Communication

UDC 654.197: 791.43

Andrii Mazepa

Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv.

ORCID 0000-0002-6285-6109

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-14-2018-2.192-198

Keywords: television series, television space, public communication, postmodern, culture.

Abstract. The purpose of the article is to study the role of television series as a system-forming factor of modern public communication in the field of domestic television space. The relevance of the article is determined by the insufficient knowledge of the structure and content of modern television series, which is the public basis of communication. In the scientific discourse there are no works that make it possible to comprehend the television series as part of the general cultural media space and contribute to the identification of semiotic codes that determine the unity of the sphere of public communication. The article points out that the development of the information and cultural space is becoming a factor of a powerful influence on society, especially young people. The article reveals the basic principles of building a postmodern television space, defines its specificity as an element of cultural policy. In this sense, the thematic content of the television series is based not so much on the foundation of pure artistic creativity as on the information field that the media form. The television series has the ability to blur the line between documentary and artistic reality and brings this communication characteristic to a new level – creating artistically revised reconstructions of real events within the framework of the paradigm “as it really was”. Due to this, the television can have a powerful manipulative potential.

Author Biography.

Andrii Mazepa, post-graduate student, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv.

376@ukr.net

References:

Barna, N. V. (2014). Kultura v informatsionnom obshchestve: protsessy transformatsii. Multiversum. Filosofskiy almanakh, (8–9), pp. 3–12. (in Ukrainian)

Virilio, P. (No date). Informacionnaja bomba. Strategija obmana. Retrieved from http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Polit/Vir/index.php (in Russian)

Gerasim, Y. (2007). Kategorialnaya oppozitsiya «universalnoye/natsionalnoye» v yetnoyestetichnikh izmereniyakh. Vestnik Lvovskogo universiteta. Seriya zhurnalistika. Lviv, (31), pp. 131–139. (in Ukrainian)

Dadamjan, G. (1979). Vosprijatie monumental’nogo iskusstva tipy, mehanizmy, jeffektivnost’: opyt jempiricheskogo issledovanija. Voprosy sociologii iskusstva. Moscow, pp.194–248. (in Russian)

Erasov, B. S. Social’naja kul’turologija. Moscow. (in Russian)6. Kagan, M. S. (1998). Filosofija kul’tury: stanovlenie i razvitie. St. Petersburg. (in Russian)

Kagan, M. S. (1998). Filosofija kul’tury: stanovlenie i razvitie. St. Petersburg. (in Russian)

Kis, R. (2002). Yаzyk, mysl i kulturnaya realnost. Lviv. (in Ukrainian)

Merlo-Ponti, M. (1999). Fenomenologija vosprijatija. St. Petersburg. (in Russian)

Plotnitskaya, A. (No date). Pedagogicheskaya tekhnologiya i etapy formirovaniya khudozhestvenno-analiticheskikh umeniy budushchego uchitelya muzyki. Retrieved from http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/6048/ (in Ukrainian)

Polyakova, T. A., & Demchenko, V. D. (2015). Kino i televideniye: dva puti razvitiya massovoy kommunikatsii. Dnepropetrovsk. (in Ukrainian)

Sappak, V. S. (2007). Televidenie i my. Moscow. (in Russian)

Sokolov, E. G. (2004). Konservativnye tendencii v sovremennoj kul’ture. Filosofija i social’no-politicheskie cennosti konser-vatizma v obshhestvennom soznanii (ot istokov k sovremennosti): sb. Statej. Ju. N. Solonina (Ed.). St. Petersburg, pp. 225–245. (in Russian)

Tejlor, Je. B. (2009). Pervobytnaja kul’tura. Moscow, Vol. 1.(in Russian)

White, L. (No date). The Science of Culture: A Study of Man and Civilization. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/scienceofculture00whit

PDF (Ukrainian)

Published: November 22, 2018.

Vol 14 No 2 (2018).

Section: APPLIED CULTURAL STUDIES AND CULTURAL PRACTICES.