UDC 355.01
Hanna Chmil
Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv.
ORCID ID 0000-0001-6569-1066
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-25-2024-1.25-39
Keywords: artisanal turn, artisan product, experience of time, cosmic artisan, ecology of creativity, relational subjectivity, non-anthropocentric reality, neo-artisan, metamodern.
Abstract.
In the proposed study, the so-called “artisanal turn” is comprehended in the context of the metamodern cultural and philosophical paradigm, the peculiarities of the metamodern situation in philosophy and art. Invoking arguments of domestic authors who study metamodern ideas in domestic scientific thought, their influence on the state of modern culture and art, it is proved that reflections on the peculiarities of cultural and artistic life go beyond postmodernism and require addressing the situation of metamodernity. The overlap in traditional, postmodern and metamodern cultural codes testifies in favor of metamodernity as a cultural stage of the development of society and a philosophical trend reflected by cultural metamodernity in connection with the “artisanal turn” in art. Because this turn is a new look at people, culture, new avant-garde aesthetics, original artistic styles. The metamodern artistic paradigm is a new modality of the transdeductive relationship of people to things and transindividual relationships between people, and a cosmic artisan is a relational subjectivity. Art “returns” to the artisanal age of the sixteenth century Middle Ages, which leads to the deceptive illusion of craftsmanship as a sphere of realization of personal authenticity, both from the point of view of theory and artistic practice, but in this there is more of a modern alchemical minimalism, analogous to the mode of activity of the cosmic artisan described by Deleuze and Guattari with its inherent manneristic virtuosity which was truly new.
The discussion of the issue of the “metaphysics of the artisanal turn”, the return of craftsmanship and mannerism in modern crafts helps artists clarify their place in culture and assert their professional authenticity through created artistic values, and for philosophers the concept of the “artisanal turn” illuminates its main meaning and specific meanings, subjective and objective parameters, a logical and emotional component of a fundamentally new aesthetics of beauty, which was initiated by the surrealism of the 20th century.
Authors Biography.
Hanna Chmil, Director of the Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Full Member of National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, associate professor, Kyiv.
References:
Andersen, L. R. (2019). Metamodernity (Paper Based on the book «Metamodernity: Meaning and Hope in a Complex World»). A Nordic Bildung Food for Thought. 17 p.
Artemenko, Ya. I. (2022). Body, Plasticity, and The Limits of «Self» as Paradigmatic Markers of The Meta-Modern Anthropology. Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University Journal. Philosophical Sciences. No. 1(91). P. 69–77. Retrieved from http://surl.li/mtvrm
Baudrillard, J. (2005). The Conspiracy of Art. Semiotext(e). 248 p.
Carroll, G. R. (2015). Authenticity: Attribution, Value, and Meaning. In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. P. 1–13. Retrieved from http://surl.li/mwhvx. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0020
Deleuze, G. (1970). Proust et les signes. 2nd ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Deleuze, G. (1980). Enteretiens inedits. Aix-en-Provence. P. 90–91.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1972). Capitalisme et schizophrenia. Tome I. L’Anti-Oedipe. P. 130.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1976). Rhizome. Introduction. Paris: Minuit.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Р. 345.
Dumitrescu, A. E. (2014). Towards a Metamodern Literature: PhD Thesis in Languages and Cultures. Dunedin: University of Otago. 271 p. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/4925
Dupré, Sven, Kerssenbrock-Krosigk, Dedo, & Wismer, Beat (Eds). (2014, 5 April–10 August). Art and Alchemy: The Mystery of Transformation (Düsseldorf, Museum Kunstpalast). Catalogue Kunst und Alchemie: das Geheimnis der Verwandlung (English: Art and Alchemy: The Mystery of Transformation). Munich: Hirmer. 280 pp. with 194 colour illus.
Feigelfeld, Heidrun, Huber, Florian, & Wieser, Robert (2015). Effects Of Urban Regeneration – Social/Structural-Spatial And Property Market. University Library of Munich, Germany.
Freinacht, H. (2017). The Listening Society: A Metamodern Guide to Politics, Book One (Metamodern Guides 1). Metamoderna ApS. 414 р.
Freinacht, H. (March 10, 2020). Metamodern View of the Human Being Metamoderna. Retrieved from http://surl.li/mtukw
Horislavets, E. V. (2020, April 23–24). Khudozhni stratehii metamodernizmu v kulturi audiovizualnykh mystetstv [Artistic strategies of metamodernism in the culture of audiovisual arts]. Kultura ta informatsiine suspilstvo XXI stolittia: mater. vseukr. nauk.-teoret. konf. molodykh uchenykh. Kharkiv. P. 18–19. (in Ukrainian)
Kretov, P. V., & Kretova, O. I. (2020). Temporalnyi rezhym modernu, postmodernu i metamodernu: naratyvno-dyskursyvnyi aspekt [The temporal mode of modernity, postmodernity and metamodernity: narrative-discursive aspect]. Herald of Cherkasy University. Series “Historical Sciences”. № 1. P. 7–16. (in Ukrainian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31651/2076-5908-2020-1-7-16
Kultaieva, Maria. (2011). Filosofiia: zhyttia pislia smerti. Nimetskyi pohliad na postbolonski realii [Philosophy: life after death. The German view of post-Bologna realities]. Philosophical Thought, 2011, №2, p.70–84. (in Ukrainian)
Latour, Bruno. (2010). An Attempt at Writing a Compositionist Manifesto. New Literary History, 41 (3), P.471–490. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2010.a408295
Odrobinskyi, Yu. V. (2015). Etnofuturyzm yak osnova suchasnoho dyzainu v Ukraini [Ethnofuturism as the basis of modern design in Ukraine]. Stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku kulturolohichnoi nauky v Ukraini: materialy nauk.-prakt. konf. Mykolaiv. Part 1. P. 135–139. (in Ukrainian)
Odrobinskyi, Yu. V. (2018). Metamodernizm i skulptura: svitovyi i ukrainskyi kontekst [Metamodernism and sculpture: world and Ukrainian context]. Gilea: Scientific Bulletin. Iss. 132. P. 261–265. Retrieved from http://surl.li/mtxrd (in Ukrainian)
Onishchenko, O. I. (2021a). Metamodernizm: Teoretychna realnist chy «fihura filosofii»? [Metamodernism: Theoretical reality or “figure of philosophy”?]. Scientific Bulletin of the Kyiv National University of Cinema and Television Theater named after IK Karpenko-Kary. Series: Culture. № 27–28. P. 137–144. Retrieved from http://surl.li/mtxqo (in Ukrainian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34026/1997-4264.27-28.2021.238837
Onishchenko, O. I. (2021b). Vid «post» do «meta» modernizmu: protses kulturotvorchykh poshukiv [From the “post” to the “goal” of modernism: the process of cultural research]. Scientific Bulletin of the Kyiv National University of Theater, Cinema and Television named after I. K. Karpenko-Kary. № 29. С. 60–66. Retrieved from http://surl.li/mtxqt (in Ukrainian) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34026/1997-4264.29.2021.248740
Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. St. Martin’s Griffin. 522 p.
Sennett, R. (2009). The craftsman. London: Penguin.
Siryak, G. (2020). Ukrainske mystetstvo v konteksti perekhodu vid postmodernistskoi hiperrealnosti do shchyrosti metamodernizmu [Ukrainian art in the context of the transition from postmodern hyperreality to the sincerity of metamodernism]. Almanac of science. № 1. P. 15–17. (in Ukrainian)
Skovoroda, Hrygorii. (2011). Povna akademichna zbirka tvoriv [Complete academic collection of works]. Professor Leonid Ushkalov (Ed.). Kharkiv–Edmonton–Toronto: Maidan; Publishing House of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies. 1400 p. (in Ukrainian)
Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67
Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Random House, Inc.
Ushkalov, L. V. (2004). Hryhorii Skovoroda: seminarii [Hryhorii Skovoroda: seminary]. Kharkiv: Maidan. 776 p. (in Ukrainian)
PDF.
Published: .
Section: THEORY AND HISTORY OF CULTURE.