UDC 719:353.1 (477)
Maryna Mishchenko
Institute for Cultural Research, National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv
ORCID 0000-0002-2066-8097
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-22-2022-2.148-157
Keywords: cultural heritage, protection of cultural heritage, objects of cultural heritage, monuments of national importance, monuments of local significance, protection of objects of cultural heritage.
Abstract. The aim of this paper is to analyze the regional features of protection of objects of cultural heritage of different regions of Ukraine in the conditions of new challenges of modernity, in particular in view of russian military invasion of the territory of our state.
Methodology. The author uses as a methodological basis of this study the principles and methods of the cultural approach to the analysis of numerous publications, practical experience and norms of national legislation on the protection of cultural heritage.
Results. It is determined that in most of the analyzed areas the quantitative indicator of monuments belongs to those factors that influence the implementation and variable component of the set of measures for the protection of cultural heritage of specific regions. At the same time, a significant number of monuments is not a guarantee of effective implementation of these measures by local authorities and the appropriate level of development of the monument protection sphere.
It is necessary to investigate more thoroughly initiatives of foreign partners on digitizing of objects of cultural heritage of Ukraine. As the adopted activity is connected not only to mechanical preservation of information about them, it can assist further renewal of the monuments, which might be damaged in the conditions of war.
Novelty. The guard of objects of cultural heritage of our state in the conditions of military intervention fully depends on a base criterion – that, what region they are in – conditionally “safe” or on territories, that temporally are not being controlled by Ukrainian government, and also whether there is the real possibility to take urgent guard measures. Therefore one of the effective methods of guard of monuments is “physical” protection in the localities where for this purpose there are necessary facilities.
Author Biography.
Maryna Mishchenko, Ph.D. in Law, Institute for Cultural Research, National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv/
mishchenko_m@ukr.net
References:
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy, zi zminamy ta dopovnenniamy [Constitution of Ukraine, as amended]. (1996, June 28). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. № 30. Art. 141. (in Ukrainian)
Kot, S. I. (2010). Okhorona pamiatok istorii ta kultury [Protection of historical and cultural monuments]. Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy. Vol. 7. 728 p. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)
Lytovchenko, V. V. (2013, November 26–29). Zberezhennia i okhorona kulturnoi spadshchyny v suchasnii Ukraini: vnutrishni i zovnishni aspekty [Preservation and protection of cultural heritage in modern Ukraine: internal and external aspects]. Mizhnarodnyi naukovyi visnyk: zbirnyk naukovykh statei za materialamy XXVII Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii. Uzhhorod – Budapest. Issue 8 (27). P. 361–367. Uzhhorod: DVNZ «UzhNU». (in Ukrainian)
Ministerstvo kultury ta informatsiinoi polityky Ukrainy. (2022, May 5). MKIP zafiksovano ponad 300 epizodiv voiennykh zlochyniv rosiian proty kulturnoi spadshchyny [MCIP recorded more than 300 episodes of Russian war crimes against cultural heritage]. Retrieved from https://mkip.gov.ua/news/7109.html (in Ukrainian)
Molodkovets, M. (2022, March 28). «Perezhyly nimtsiv, perezhyvut i rosiian». Yak kyiany zakhyshchaiut stolychni pamiatnyky vid mozhlyvykh obstriliv [“Survived the Germans, will survive the Russians.” How Kyivans are protecting the capital’s monuments from possible shelling]. NV Kyiv. Retrieved from https://nv.ua/ukr/kyiv/u-kiyevi-pam-yatniki-zahishchayut-vid-obstriliv-foto-video-novini-kiyeva-50228962.html (in Ukrainian)
Polyvach, K. A. (2012). Kulturna spadshchyna ta yii vplyv na rozvytok rehioniv Ukrainy [Cultural heritage and its impact on the development of the regions of Ukraine]. 208 p. Kyiv: Instytut heohrafii NAN Ukrainy. (in Ukrainian)
Pro okhoronu kulturnoi spadshchyny: iz Zakonu Ukrainy [On protection of cultural heritage: from the Law of Ukraine]. (2000, July 21). Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy. № 27. P. 32. (in Ukrainian)
Svitlova, N., Shykula, M., & Dunska, O. (2022, March 12). Vstanovliuiut zakhysni ekrany ta zbyraiut mishky z piskom: yak ukrainski mista namahaiutsia vriatuvaty istorychni pamiatky [Protective screens are being installed and sandbags are being collected: how Ukrainian cities are trying to save historical monuments]. Pershyi ukrainskyi informatsiinyi. Retrieved from https://www.5.ua/suspilstvo/vstanovliuiut-zakhysni-ekrany-ta-zbyraiut-mishky-z-piskom-iak-ukrainski-mista-namahaiutsia-vriatuvaty-istorychni-pamiatky-271095.html (in Ukrainian)
Tsyfrova transformatsiia okhorony kulturnoi spadshchyny (e-Spadshchyna) [Digital transformation of cultural heritage protection (e-Heritage)]. (2021). Proyekty cyfrovoyi transformaciyi. Retrieved from https://plan2.diia.gov.ua/projects (in Ukrainian)
Published: July 15, 2022.
Section: MUSEOLOGY AND PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE.