Peculiarities of understanding myth in the theories of intellectuals of the late 19th and early 20th centuries

Oles Dovhanyk

National University of Kyiv-Mogyla Academy, Kyiv.
ORCID ID 0000-0002-7429-2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-26-2024-2.41-52

Keywords: myth, archetype, interdisciplinarity, mythological thought, cultural dimension, political myth, cultural problems, cultural practices.

Abstract.

The article reveals the multifaceted understanding of myth and the peculiarities of its definition in various fields of knowledge by the following researchers: B. Malinowski, J. Fraser, C. Lévi-Strauss, S. Freud, K. Abraham, A. Rank, R. Sachs, C. Jung, E. Cassirer, and R. Barthes. The study identifies the central components of myth and their role in the construction of the social dimension. The specifics of the understanding of myth in the theories of researchers were clarified through the use of the following methods and approaches: critical-analytical, typological, comparative, historical, and systemic. The study establishes that myth is a central component of the formation of the symbolic human plane. It is revealed that myth is an interpretive frame of the surrounding world for different groups or communities. The variability of the internal content of the myth in accordance with the socio-cultural transformations of society is identified.

In this research, for the first time, we have carried out a comprehensive interdisciplinary theoretical review and analysis of various approaches to understanding the myth in humanitarian knowledge. This contributes to the formation of a systematized view of the meaning and place of myth in the socio-cultural dimension.

Authors Biography.

Oles Dovhanyk, postgraduate student of the Culturology Department, National University of Kyiv-Mogyla Academy, Kyiv.

oles.dovhanyk@ukma.edu.ua

References:

Abraham, K., & White, W. A. (1912). Dreams and myths. A study in race psychology. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 39 (7), pp. 475–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-191207000-00012

Baciu, C. (2018). The meaning of political myth in Ernst Cassirer. Institute for Philosophy and Psychology. Retrieved from https://cogito.ucdc.ro/nr_2/6%20-%20Claudiu%20Baciu%20-%20THE%20MEANING%20OF%20POLTICAL%20MYTH%20IN%20ERNST%20CASSIRER.pdf

Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. Noonday. (Original work published in 1957)

Cassirer, E. (1946). The Myth of the State. Yale University Press G. Cumberlege, Oxford University Press.

Cassirer, E. (1953). Language and Myth. Dover Publications. (Original work published in 1925)

Cook, A. (1976). Lévi-Strauss and Myth: A Review of Mythologiques [Review of Mythologiques; The Raw and The Cooked.; From Honey to Ashes.; L’Origine des manières de table.; L. Homme nu.; The Savage Mind., by C. Lévi-Strauss, R. C., H. A., O. M. T., H. N., & S. M.]. MLN, 91(5), 1099–1116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2907118

Frazer, J. G. (2012). Golden Bough. Barnes & Noble, Incorporated. (Original work published in 1890)

Freud, S. (1900). Die Traumdeutung. F. Deuticke. (in German)

Jung, C. G. (1979). Aion: Researches into the phenomenology of the self (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Jung, C. G. (2018). Arkhetypy i kolektyvne nesvidome [Archetypes and collective unconscious] (K. Kotiuk, Trans.). Astroliabiia. (Original work published in 1959) (In Ukrainian)

Leheza, O. (2019). Kontseptsiia mifu u tvorchosti Rolana Barta [Concept of myth in works of Roland Barthes]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia filosofsko-politolohichni studii, (23), pp. 54–59. Retrieved from http://fps-visnyk.lnu.lviv.ua/archive/23_2019/9.pdf (In Ukrainian)

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Plon.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. Basic Books.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (2001). Mit ta znachennia [Myth and sense]. Antolohiia svitovoi literaturno-krytychnoi dumky dvadtsiatogo stolittia (M. Maierchyk, Trans.; pp. 446–462). Litopys. Retrieved from https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Levi-Strauss_Claude/Mit_ta_znachennia.pdf (In Ukrainian)

Malinowski, B. (1926). Myth in primitive psychology. K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.

Menzhulin, V. (2021). Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung on Myths and Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious: Unnoticed Similarity. NaUKMA Research Papers in Philosophy and Religious Studies, 8, pp. 25–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-1678.2021.8.25-37

Omelchenko, V. (2021). On the question of modern myths. Political myth as applied mythology. Sophia. Human and Religious Studies, Bulletin 17(1), pp. 44–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2021.17.9

Petrushkevych, M. (2008). Mifolohichnyi horyzont klasychnoho psykhoanalizu [Mythological horizon of classical psychoanalysis]. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seria: Filosofiia, (3), pp. 93–101. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nznuoafs_2008_3_11 (In Ukrainian)

Pillai, A. A., & Kaushal, D. U. (2021). Myth Theory: A Study towards Mythic Tale and It’s Reach in Today’s Life. Smart Moves Journal Ijellh, pp. 8–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24113/ijellh.v9i9.11162

Rank, O. (2004). The Myth of the Birth of the Hero: A Psychological Exploration of Myth. Johns Hopkins University Press. (Original work published in 1909)

Rank, O., & Sachs, H. (1916). The significance of psychoanalysis for the mental sciences (C. Rockwell Payne, Trans.). The Nervous and mental disease publishing company.

Sevruk, K. (2024). Mif yak obiekt doslidzhennia linhvistyky ta sumizhnykh nauk [Myth as an object of Research in Linguistics and related sciences]. Naukovi rozvidky studentiv fakultetu inozemnoi filolohii Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni H. S. Skovorody: zbirnyk tez naukovykh dopovidey, (5), pp. 64–66. Retrieved from https://dspace.hnpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/16343 (In Ukrainian)

Siedin, O. (2021). Revealing the Rationality of Myth: Contribution of Bronislaw Malinowski. Studia Polsko-Ukraińskie, 8, pp. 165–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/2451-2958spu.8.12

Tkachuk, D. V. (2021). Mifolohizm u novitnii zarubizhnii literaturi [Mythologism in modern foreign literature]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats studentiv ta mahistrantiv Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka, (15), p. 75. Retrieved from https://meridian.kpnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Zb-stud-K-PNU-2021-v15.pdf#page=75 (In Ukrainian)

Tytar, O. V. (2008). Lohika mifu ta lohika nauky u suchasnii kulturi [Logics of myth and logics of sciences in modern culture]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V.N. Karazina. Teoriia kultury i filosofiia nauky, (803), pp. 138-142. (In Ukrainian)

PDF (in Ukrainian).

Published: 

Vol 26 No 2 (2024)

Section: .