UDC 316:303.446.2:130.2
Ihor Yudkin
Institute for Cultural Research, National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv
ORCID 0000-0002-4616-302X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-18-2020-2.8-22
Keywords: parcellation, cyclic structure, distance, reflection, prototype, automatism, intuitive logics, subjective perspective.
Abstract. Eidetic abstractions based upon individuation together with heuristic programs for the examination of conjectures are the forms of intentional reflection developed within the intuitive thought. The initial point of such development is parcellation of cultural texts that is to be marked where the introduced relation “the whole – the parts” passes further to the relation “the inner – the outer” and “text – epoch” with the principle of subjective activity and the inner textual transformation in reflection that gain importance. It is textual spatial and temporal structure where eidetic and heuristic elements come into interaction most effectively; in particular, the construction of depth in a pictorial plane serves as the model for the cognition of historical reality that cannot be observed immediately. The model of labyrinth in which frames of the heuristic searches are displayed determines their procedures as the sequence of alternative choices where the continuous correction of hypotheses takes place. The premises for the development of heuristic programs are those of ambiguity and indefiniteness of eidetic images together with the self-denial of the automatism of rhetoric conventions. It is due to heuristics that the prototypes for textual eidetic images are to be found. Prototypes function as the eidetic abstractions of personal characters addressed to scenic interpretation. Textual cyclic structure builds up the necessary condition for the disclosure and mediation of distance between the text and history, from closed episodes to the epoch.
Author Biography.
Ihor Yudkin, Doctor of art studies, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, leading researcher, Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv.
dr.iyudkin@gmail.com
Referencеs:
Aihenvald, Yu. A. (1977). Ostujev [Ostuzhev]. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (Jizn v iskusstve). 264 p. (In Russian)
Altshuller, G. S. (1973). Algoritm izobreteniya [The Algorithm of Invention]. Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dopl. Moscow: Moskovskii rabochii. 296 p. (In Russian)
Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily communication. 2nd ed. New York: Methuen. 364 p.
Arnheim, R. (1973). Vizualnoe myshlenie [Visual Thought]. Zritelnye obrazy. Fenomenologiya i eksperiment. Sbornik perevodov. Part 1. Dushanbe: Tadjikskii gos. universitet. P. 8–98. (In Russian)
Arnheim, R. (1976). Iskusstvo i vizualnoe vospriyatie [The Art and Visual Perception]. Moscow: Progress. 392 p. (In Russian)
Beletsky, A. A. (1972). Leksikologiya i teoriya yazykoznaniya (onomastika) [Lexicology and the Theory of Language (Onomastics)]. Kiev: Izd. Kievskogo universiteta. 212 p. (In Russian)
Broitman, S. N. (2004). Istoricheskaya poetika [Historical Poetics]. Teoriya literatury in 2 vols. Edited by N. D. Tamarchenko. Vol. 2. Moscow: Academia. 362 p. (In Russian)
Buhr, M., & Irrlitz, G. (1978). Prityazaniya razuma. Iz istorii nemeckoi klassicheskoi filosofii literatury [Der Anspruch der Vernunft]. Transl. from German by Z. V. Gorlova & V. N. Pavlova. Ed. by A. V. Gulyga. Moscow: Progress. (Obschestvennye nauki za rubejom. Filosofiya) 328 p. (In Russian)
Denisov, E. (1972). Kompozicionnyi process i vozmojnosti ego formalizacii pri issledovanii [A Composer’s Procedure and the Opportunities of its Formalization in Researches]. Tochnye metody i muzykalnoe iskusstvo. Rostov na Donu: Izd. Rostovskogo universiteta. P. 12–18. (In Russian)
Gablick, Susan. (1976). Progress in Art. London: Thames and Hudson. 192 p.
Glowinski, M. (1975). On concretization. In: Graff, P., Krzemien-Ojak, S. (eds.). Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics. Warszawa: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. P. 33–45.
Gostuski, D. (1968). Vreme umetnosti (prilog zasnivanju jedne opste nauke o oblicima) [The Time of Art (an Introduction to the Foundations of a General Science on Images)]. Beograd: Prosveta. 406 p. (In Serbian)
Gregory, R. L. (2003). Razumnyi glaz [The Intelligent Eye]. Izd. 2-e. (1-e izd. 1979). R. Dubravskaya (Ed.). Transl. from English by A. I. Kogan. Moscow: Editorial URSS. 240 p. (In Russian)
Ingarden, R. (1976). O poznawaniu dzieła literackiego [On the Cognition of a Literary Work]. Warszawa: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. (Ingarden R. Dziela filozoficzne). 468 s. (In Polish)
Kitaev-Smyk, L. A. (2007). Faktory napryajennosti tvorcheskogo processa [The Factors of Tension in Creative Procedure]. Voprosy psihologii. № 3. P. 69–82. (In Russian)
Knebel, M. O. (1961). O deistvennom analize piesy i roli [On the Action Analysis of a Play and a Role]. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 132 p. (In Russian)
Knebel, M. O. (1967). Vsya jizn [All the Life]. Moscow: Vserossiiskoe teatralnoe obschestvo. 588 p. (In Russian)
Korchezhinskaya, V. I., Kuzmina, T. V., & Malyarevsky A. L. (1980). Izuchenie struktury narusheniya sluhorechevoi pamyati [The Researches of the Distortions of Memory for Speech and Sound]. Psihologicheskii jurnal. № 5. P. 82–92. (In Russian)
Kostandov, E. A. (1983). Funkcionalnaya asimmetriya polusharii mozga i neosoznavaemoe vospriyatie [The Functional Asymmetry of the Hemispheres of a Brain and the Subconscious Perception]. Moscow: Nauka. 172 p. (In Russian)
Leiderman, N. A. (2010). Teoriya zhanra. Issledovaniya i razbory [The Theory of Genre. Researches and Analyses]. Ekaterinburg: Uralskii gos. ped. institut. 900 p. (In Russian)
Levashov, O. V. (1981). O razlichii v principah pererabotki zritelnoi informacii v pravom i levom polushariyah golovnogo mozga [On the Differences of the Principles of Visual Information’s Elaboration in the Left and Right Hemispheres of the Cerebral Brain]. Problemy upravleniya v tehnike, ekonomike i biologii. Moscow: Nauka. P. 207–212. (In Russian)
Luria, A. R. (1994). Malenkaya knizhka o bolshoi pamyati [A Little Booklet on the Big Memory]. Moscow: Eidos. Izd. 2-e. (Izd. 1-e 1965). 102 p. (In Russian)
Markiewicz, H. (1975). Places of indeterminacy in literary work. In: Graff, P., Krzemien-Ojak, S. (eds.). Roman Ingarden and Contemporary Polish Aesthetics. Warszawa: Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. P. 159–171.
Metzger, Wolfgang. (1975). Gesetze des Sehens [The Laws of Vision]. 3. Völlig neubearbeitete Auflage. (1. Aufl. 1936. 2-Aufl. 1953). (Senkenberg Buch Bd. 54). 676 p. (In German)
Mochalov, L. V. (1979). O sistematike tipov prostranstvennogo postroeniya kartiny [On the Systems of the Types of Spatial Construction of a Picture]. Sovetskoe iskusstvoznanie 78. Issue 2. Moscow: Sovetskii hudozhnik. P. 295–314. (In Russian)
Nekrasova, E. A. (1984). Neosuschestvlennyi zamysel 1920-h godov sozdaniya Symbolarium’a (slovarya simvolov) i ego pervyi vypusk «tochka» [The Unrealized Draft from the 1920s on the Preparation of Symbolarium (the Dictionary of Symbols) and its first Issue “The Point”]. Pamyatniki kultury. Novye otkrytiya. Pismennost. Iskusstvo. Arheologiya. 1982. Leningrad: Nauka. P. 99–115. (In Russian)
Raushenbah, B. V. (1980). Prostranstvennye postroeniya v zhivopisi. Ocherk osnovnyh metodov [Spatial Constructions in the Painting. An Outline of the Principal Methods]. Moskva: Nauka. (AN SSSR. VNII Iskusstvoznaniya Ministerstva kultury SSSR). 288 p. (In Russian)
Raushenbah, B. V. (1986). Sistemy perspektivy v izobrazitelnom iskusstve. Obschaya teoriya perspektivy [The Systems of Perspectives in the Pictorial Art. The General Theory of Perspective]. Moskva: Nauka. 156 p. (In Russian)
Rotenberg, V. S. (1980). Slovo i obraz: problema podteksta [Word and Image: The Problems of Implicit Contents]. Voprosy filosofii. № 4. P. 152–155. (In Russian)
Serebryannikov, O. F. (1970). Evristicheskie principy i logicheskie ischisleniya [The Heuristic Principles and the Logical Calculus]. Ed.-in-chief Biryukov, B. V. Moscow: Nauka. 284 p. (In Russian)
Sholomii, K. M. (1969). O razlichii mezhdu evristicheskimi i neevristicheskimi programmami [On the Difference between the Heuristic and Non-Heuristic Programs]. Voprosy psihologii. № 3. P. 37–45. (In Russian)
Slyva, T. V. (2014). Meronimy v sostave associativno-semanticheskih grupp [Meronyms within Associative-Semantic Groups]. Naukovii chasopys Natsіonalnogo pedagogіchnogo unіversytetu. Ser. 9. Suchasnі tendencії rozvitku mov. Issue 11. P. 223–227. (In Russian)
Strzemiński, Wł. (1969). Teoria widzenia [The Theory of Vision]. Krakow: Wydawnictwo literackie. 256 s. (In Polish)
Ulanovskii, A. M. (2010). Idei fenomenologicheskoi psihologii v kontekste sovremennyh teorii i predstavlenii [The Ideas of Phenomenological Psychology within the Context of the Current Theories and Concepts]. Voprosy psihologii. № 2. P. 20–30. (In Russian)
Yakobson, V. P. (1987). Pavel Samoilov. Stsenicheskaya biografiya ego geroev [Pavel Samoylov. The Scenic Biography of his Heroes]. Leningrad: Iskusstvo. 206 p. (In Russian)
Yellott, John I., Jr. (1981). Binocular Depth Inversion. Scientific American. Vol. 245. July. N. 1. P. 118–125.
Yudkіn, І. (2019). Fenomenologіya yak metodologіya іstorichnoї poetiki [Phenomenology as the Methodology of Historical Poetics]. The Cultural Ideas. № 16. P. 20–35. (In Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-16-2019-2.20-35
Yudkіn, І. (2020 a). Fenomenologіchna іntuitsіya v mistetskіi іnterpretatsіi іstorіi. [Phenomenological Intuition in the Artistic Interpretation of History]. The Cultural Ideas. № 17. P. 8–18. (In Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-17-2020-1.8-18
Yudkіn, І. (2020 b). Hudozhnі detalі v semantychnomu rytmі dramatychnogo tvoru [Artistic Details in the Semantic Rhythm of a Dramatic Play]. Mistectvoznavstvo Ukraini. Vol. 20. P. 280–287. (In Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31500/2309-8155.19.2019.186016
Published: August 10, 2020.
Section: THEORY AND HISTORY OF CULTURE.