UDC 316.772.5:[159.922-042.72:07](045)
Maryna Mishchenko
Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-15-2019-1.169-176
Keywords: screen space, dependence, dependence on the Internet World network, dependence on the TV, dependence on the screen, screen dependency
Abstract. The article represents the investigation of such a common phenomenon as screen dependency and its impact on the life-creativity of a modern man.In a modern changing world, it is difficult to avoid humanity’s interaction with various advances in the field of modern technology and new information technologies – mobile communications, personal desktops and laptops, services of the global Internet. It constantly occurs at different times of the day, in varying degrees, without a specific place or sphere of human activity. Screen dependency is the acute obsessive need of a person to use devices, the design feature of which is a screen availability, through which various types of information represent real life and which make modern Internet technologies material. While researching, it was discovered that the screen dependency actually covers a number of other well-known destructive human dependencies, in particular, dependence on the computer, television, mobile communications, and the global Internet network. It is determined and argued that the screen devices as a powerful source of information and a significant resource of social development can enrich the artist with the latest creative ideas. At the same time, excessive enthusiasm in screen products may not only have a negative impact on the physical and mental health of a person, but also lead to very negative consequences for the culture, in particular, the numerous borrowings of other artistic ideas, the depreciation of traditional culture and its components, the loss of one’s own creative personality.
Author Biography.
Maryna Mishchenko, Ph.D. in Law, Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv.
mishchenko_m@ukr.net
References:
Abysova, M. (2018). Komunikatyvnyi potentsial kulturnykh vidminnostei u informatsiinomu suspilstvi. Visnyk Natsionalnoho aviatsiinoho universytetu. Seriia «Filosofiia. Kulturolohiia», 1 (27), 39–43. (in Ukrainian)
Bodrijjar, Zh. (2000). Simvolicheskij obmen i smert’. S. N. Zenkin (Ed.). Moscow. Retrieved from https://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/3484 (in Russian)
Zalezhnist. Zvidky ta dlia choho? (No date). Retrieved from https://nodus.ua/blog/patologiya-psikhichnikh-protsesiv/zalezhnist-zvidki-ta-dlya-chogo/ (in Ukrainian)
Internet-zalezhnist yak novyi fenomen suchasnoho svitu: sutnist i problematyka. (2011). Kyiv: NISD. (in Ukrainian)
Luchanyn vymahaie vid hurtu «Antytila» milion hryven. (No date). Retrieved from https://news.t1.ua/tabloyid/21436-luchanyn-vymahaye-vid-hurtu-antytila-milyon-hryven.html (in Ukrainian)
Mishchenko, M. O. (2018). Plahiat yak nevidiemna skladova zaluchennia liudyny do ekrannoho prostoru [Plagiarizm as an independent constituent of human attraction to the screen space]. The Culturology Ideas, 13 (1), 132–137. (in Ukrainian)
Orokhovska, L. A. (2014). Internet ta virtualna realnist. Visnyk Natsionalnoho aviatsiinoho universytetu. Seriia «Filosofiia. Kulturolohiia», 1 (19), 40–44. (in Ukrainian)
Poda, T. A. (2018). Sotsiokulturni aspekty fenomena internet-zalezhnosti. Visnyk NAU. Seriia: Filosofiia. Kulturolohiia, 2 (28), 107–112. (in Ukrainian)
Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. (1972). 11 vol. Vol. 3, 182.
Jur’eva, L. N., & Bol’bot, T. Ju. (2006). Komp’juternaja zavisimost’: formirovanie, diagnostika, korrekcija i profilaktika: monografija. Dnepropetrovsk: Porogi. (in Russian)
Ianh, K. S. (No date). Dyahnoz – Ynternet-zavysymost. Retrieved from http://septemberfox.ucoz.ru/biblio/kimberly.html (in Russian)
Goldberg, I. (No date). Internet addiction disorder. CyberPsychol. Behavior. Vol. 3. 4, 403–412.
Gregory, C. (No date). What is Internet Addiction? Retrieved from http://www.psycom.net/iadcriteria.html
Published: June 20, 2019.
Section: APPLIED CULTURAL STUDIES AND CULTURAL PRACTICES.