UDC: 316:303.446.2:130.2
Ihor Yudkin
Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Кyiv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-15-2019-1.29-40
Keywords: theoretical fiction, absurdity, code, experiment, syncretism, hermeneutic circle, metonymy, casuistic doctrine.
Abstract. Mythology is the necessary stage in the development of abstract thinking based upon the interpretation of syncretic verbal polysemy. In opposite to the ritualistic approach, it has been stressed upon the incoherence of myth with practical activity as the construction of an imaginary virtual world where the motivation of events is represented as the consequence of intentions. It gives rise to the development of negation and entails the priority of antitheses and dualistic worldview inherited in the baroque casuistic devices of confutation. Syncretic polysemy is then reconceived as the indefiniteness, whereas the metonymic prevalence in mythological text entails its complementary construction.
The principles of indefiniteness and complementarity are inherited in heuristics as the solution of search tasks under the circumstances of the lack of data. The mythological concept of absurd gives rise to preponderant experimental errors. The mythological opposition of visible and invisible worlds correlates with the concept of the latent information of the second plane in theatre as well as the codification in myth with that of situations and characters in theatre. The metonymic row of myth is reconsidered as the gradual disclosure of circumstances on stage. The priority in the heuristic approach belongs to the exploration of characters’ faculties and intentions for the construction of a dramatic subjective perspective with the searches for the prototypes of dramatis persona.
Author Biography.
Ihor Yudkin, Dr. hab. of Art Criticism, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Institute for Сultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Кyiv.
dr.iyudkin@gmail.com
References:
Arlazorov, M.S. (1973). Protazanov. Moskva: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
Bart, R. (1989). Izbrannye raboty. Moskva: Progress. (in Russian)
Bogdanov, K.A. (2001). Povsednevnost’ i mifologija. Issledovanija po semiotike fol’klornoj dejstvitel’nosti. SPb.: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
Brilljujen, L. (1966). Nauchnaja neopredelennost’ i informacija. Moskva.: Mir. (in Russian)
Brusencov, N. P. (2002). Intellekt i dialekticheskaja triada. Artificial intelligence, (2), 53–57. (in Russian)
Brusencov, N. P. (2003). Trehznachnaja interpretacija sillogistiki Aristotelja. Istoriko-matematicheskie issledovanija. (Ser. 2. 8 (43)). Moskva.: Janus-K, 317–327. (in Russian)
Galanina (Razd’jakonova), E.V. (2013). Jevristicheskaja rol’ mifa v neklassicheskoj nauke. Izvestija Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. Filosofija, sociologija i kul’turologija. (Vol. 322. (6)), 127–130. (in Russian)
Horodyskyi, M. P. (1961). Kyivskyi teatr «Solovtsov». Kyiv: Derzhvydav obrazotvorchoho mystetstva. (in Ukrainian)
Dei, O. I. (1978). Poetyka ukrainskoi narodnoi pisni. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)
Demchuk, R. V. (2017). Metamorfozi mіfologіchnogo. MAGІSTERІUM. Kul’turologіya. (68), 14–21. (in Russian)
D’yakonov, I. M. (1990). Arhaicheskie mify Vostoka i Zapada. Moskva: Nauka. (in Russian)
Ziukov, B. B. (1985). Konstantyn Khokhlov. Kyiv: Mystetstvo. (in Ukrainian)
Il’inova, E. Yu. (2012). Mifologiya kak evristicheskii priem interpretacii kognitivnoi kartiny mira. STUDIA LINGUISTICA. Antropologicheskaya lingvistika: problemy i resheniya. (XXI). (pp. 184–194). SPb.: Politehnika-Servis. (in Russian)
Il’icheva, M. A. (1984). Askol’d Makarov. Leningrad: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
Keldysh, Yu. V. (1973). Rahmaninov i ego vremya. Moskva: Muzyka. (in Russian)
Kolesov, V. V. (1990). Obschie ponyatiya istoricheskoi stilistiki. Istoricheskaya stilistika russkogo yazyka. Petrozavodsk, 16–36. (in Russian)
Konrad, N. I. (1927, 1991). Yaponskaya literatura v obrazcah i ocherkah. Reprintnoe izdanie. Leningrad: Izdanie instituta jivyh vostochnyh yazykov im. A. S. Enukidze; Moskva: Nauka. (VIII). (in Russian)
Kosarev, A. F.(1996). Mifologiya i ee evristicheskaya znachimost’: formy chelovecheskogo bytiya i sposoby ego postijeniya v istoricheskoi perspektive. (Master’s tesis). SPb. (in Russian)
Lescheva, A. N. (2010). Priroda tekstovoi kategorii «neopredelennost’» (na materiale liriki I. Brodskogo). (Master’s tesis). Ekaterinburg. (in Russian)
Lifshic, M.A. (1979). Mifologiya drevnyaya i sovremennaya. Moskva: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
Losev, A. F. (1994). Dialektika mifa. Mif. Chislo. Suschnost’. (pp. 5–216). Moskva: Mysl’. (in Russian)
L’vov-Anohin, B. A. (1976). Mastera Bol’shogo baleta. Moskva: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
Maznichenko, M. A. (2018). Evristicheskii potencial pedagogicheskoi mifologistiki. (Master’s tesis). Moskva, Institut strategii razvitiya obrazovaniya RAO. (in Russian)
Odoevskii, V.F. Iz zapisnoi knijki. O literature i iskusstve. (pp. 33–38) Moskva: Sovremennik. (in Russian)
Pimenova, M. Vas. (2013). Ustoichivye edinicy drevnerusskogo teksta: semantika i struktura. Naukovii vіsnik Hersons’kogo derjavnogo unіversitetu. (18), 45–50. (in Russian)
Pimenova, M. Vas. (2015). Sinkretemy s ustoichivym knijnym atributom v pamyatnikah XVII v. Yazykovye kategorii i edinicy: sintagmaticheskii aspekt. Materialy 11-i mejdunarodnoi konferencii. (pp. 406–410). Vladimir. (in Russian)
Poia, D. (1961). Kak reshat’ zadachu. In V.G. Zvonareva, D.N. Bell, & YU. M. Gaiduk (Eds.). Ed. 2. Moskva: Uchpedgiz. (in Russian)
Poia, D. (1975). Matematika i pravdopodobnye rassujdeniya. In I.A. Vainshteina, & S.A. Yanovskoi (Eds.). Ed. 2, corr. Moskva: Nauka. (in Russian)
Potebnya, A. A. (1976). Iz zapisok po teorii slovesnosti (fragments). Estetika i poetika. (pp. 286–461). Moskva: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
Razd’yakonova (Galanina), E.V. (2009). Mif kak real’nost’ i real’nost’ kak mif: mifologicheskie osnovaniya sovremennoi kul’tury. (Master’s tesis). Tomsk. (in Russian)
Rozenfel’d, S. (1982). [Memories ] Vospominaniya ob A.N. Tolstom. Ed. 2, corr. (pp. 164–172). Moskva: Sovetskii pisatel’. (in Russian)
Skovoroda, H. (1973). Povne zibrannia tvoriv u 2-kh t. (2 vol., Vol. 1). Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)
Surkov, E. D. (1986). Chto nam Gekuba? Stat’i. Moskva: Sovetskii pisatel’. (in Russian)
Toporkov, A.L. (1997). Teoriya mifa v russkoi filologicheskoi nauke XIX veka. Moskva: Indrik. (in Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/folklorica.v3i1.3919
Tychkin, P.B. (2013). Evristicheskii potencial mifa v kontekste postneklassicheskogo obraza nauki. (Master’s tesis). Tomsk: Tomskii gos. Universitet. (in Russian)
Tychkin, P.B. (2012). Evristicheskie aspekty kategorii sobytie v komparativistskom analize mifa i nauki. Vestnik nauki Sibiri. Seriya V. Obschestvennye nauki. 7 (2), 237–242. (in Russian)
Freidkina, L. (1975). Rab v mundire i zvezdah. Mihail Nikolaevich Kedrov. Stat’i, rechi, besedy, zametki. Stat’i, vospominaniya o M.N. Kedrove. (pp. 363–378). Moskva: Vserossiiskoe teatral’noe obschestvo. (in Russian)
Hill, P. (1973). Nauka i iskusstvo proektirovaniya. Metody proektirovaniya, nauchnoe obosnovanie reshenii. In Kovalenko E.G., & Vendy V.F. (Eds.). Moskva: Mir. (in Russian)
Chanyshev, A.N. (1990). Traktat o nebytii Voprosy filosofii. (10), 158–165. (in Russian)
Schelling, F.V.I. (1989). Vvedenie v filosofiyu mifologii. (2 vol. Vol. 2). (pp. 159–374). Moskva: Mysl’. (in Russian)
Yudkin, I. M. (2003). Somatychna semantyka za etymolohichnymy materialamy. Tilo v tekstakh kultur. (pp. 196–204). Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy. IMFE im. M.T. Rylskoho. Ukrainskyi Etnolohichnyi Tsentr. (in Ukrainian)
Yudkin, I.M. (2017, may 25). Etymolohichni vidkryttia akademika Oleksandra Melnychuka yak osnova morfolohii kultury. Znakovi postati vitchyznianoi humanitarystyky v natsionalno-kulturnomu samostverdzhenni Ukrainy. Zbirnyk statei mizhnarodnoi naukovoi konferentsii. (pp. 70–80). Kyiv: IMFE. (in Ukrainian)
Yudkin, I. M. (2018). Intentsiia, idiomatyka, mif: do morfolohii dramy. [Intention, Idioms, Myth: Towards the Morpholog y of Drama] The Culturology Ideas, 14 (2), 19–29. (in Ukrainian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-14-2018-2.19-29
Yur’ev, Yu.M. (1948). Zapiski. Pis’ma, stat’i, rechi. Leningrad, Moskva.: Iskusstvo. (in Russian)
Yudkin, I. (2017). Hermeneutics, heuristics, morphology: the construction of metatext as the prerequisite for interpretation. The Culturology Ideas, 12 (2), 20–29.
Published: June 20, 2019.
Section: THEORY AND HISTORY OF CULTURE.