Creating a comfortable environment as a basis of effectiveness of museum communication

UDC 130.2+329.17:130.2(477)

Andrii (Andrey) Soshnikov

Kharkiv State Academy of Culture, Kharkiv.

ORCID 0000-0002-3019-5131

Olha (Olga) Ivashchenko

Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Fine Arts, Kharkiv.

ORCID 0000-0002-3213-7525

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-19-2021-1.125-134

Keywords: museum, museology, museum activity, museum communication, comfort in a museum.

Abstract. The article identifies priorities for creating a comfortable environment in museums as the basics of museum communication. It develops basic principles of creating a comfort zone as the basics for museum communication. The authorsapplied methods of analysis, synthesis and creative generalizations of empirical material.

In Ukrainian museum studies, an analysis of comfortable being in the museum as the basics of museum communication has been initiated. The authors note that the modern visitor has long ceased to be a passive observer, he takes a clear position regarding both the traditional functions of the museum and the field of museum services. The relationship between the museum and the visitor continues to develop toward the role increase of the latter. The openness of the museum to the visitor should be implemented at all levels of museum activities: from the development of infrastructure to the revision of the concepts of the museum’s permanent exhibition. Creating a renewed, attractive, comfortable environment in museums requires major changes, innovations, and experiments. In this regard, there will be a need to deepen interaction with the visitor not only at the formal level but to develop mutual communication and participation of visitors in special programs, discussions and other museum events, thus, increasing the time spent in the museum.

Authors Biography.

Andrii (Andrey) Soshnikov, Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Kharkiv State Academy of Culture, Kharkiv.

soshnikov7272@mail.ru

Olha (Olga) Ivashchenko, Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Fine Arts, Kharkiv.

ivashenkoolga1974@gmail.com      

References:

Cameron, D. F. (1970). Muzei – sovremennomu cheloveku [A Viewpoint: The Museum as a Communications System and Implications for Museum]. UNESKO Courier, 10, 22–32. (In Russian)

Dolák, Jan. (2013). Posetitel na ekspozitsii kak obekt muzeologicheskogo issledovaniya [Museum visitors as an object of museological research]. A. Maiorov (ed.-in-chief). Voprosyi muzeologii=The Problem of Museology, #1 (7), Pp. 85–92. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University.  (In Russian)

Fedorov, N. F. (1995). Muzej, ego smysl i naznachenie [Museum, its meaning and purpose]. L. B. Shalimov (ed.). Sobranie sochinenij: in 4 vols. Vol. 2. Pp. 370–422. Moscow: Izdatelskaja gruppa «Progress».  (In Russian)

Gurieva, S. D., & Kharitonova T. U. (2017). Osobennosti muzeynoy kommunikatsii: opravdannost ozhidaniy i udovletvorenie esteticheskoi potrebnosti (na primere posetiteley muzeya) [The features of museum communication: The justification of expectations and the satisfaction of aesthetic need (on the example of the museum visitors)]. Sovremennyie issledovaniya sotsialnyih problem=Society of Russia: educational space, psychological structures and social values=Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, Volume 8, Number 8–1. Krasnoyarsk: Science and Innovation Center Publishing House. Pp. 41–58.

Hudson, K. (2001). Vliyatelnyie muzei [Museums of Influence]. L. Motylev. (trans. from Engl.). Novosibirsk: Sibirskiі hronograf. (In Russian)

Ivanov, V. N. (chief ed.). (2003). Sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya: v 2 t. [Sociological encyclopedia: in 2 volumes]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian)

Jencks, Ch. (2000). Zrelischnyiy muzey – mezhdu hramom i torgovyim tsentrom. Osmyislenie protivorechiy [A spectacular museum – between the temple and the shopping center. Understanding contradictions]. Pinakoteka, 12, 5–15. Moscow: Pinakoteka. (In Russian)

Khudyakova, L. A. (2010). Muzey v epohu postmoderna: poteri ili vozmozhnosti? [The museum in a postmodern situation: The loss or possibilities?]. A. Maiorov (ed.-in-chief). Voprosyi muzeologii=The Problem of Museology, 2, Pp. 12–21. St. Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University.  (In Russian)

Kodeks muzeynoy etiki IKOM. Retrieved from http://mkrf.ru/culture-workers/proff-jetika/detail.php?ID=286800 (In Russian)

Kurilo, L. V. (2014). Novyie kontseptsii muzeev: integratsiya v sovremennoe obschestvo [New concept of museums: integration in modern society]. (Eds.) Е. N. Trofimov et al. Vestnik RMAT, 2, 139–144. Moscow region, Khimki: RIAT. (In Russian)

Markova, A., Balaeva, D., & Timofeeva, L. (2019). Problema privlecheniya posetitelya v muzey [The problem of attracting a visitor to the museum]. Kazanskij vestnik molodyh uchjonyh=Kazan Bulletin of Young Scientists, 3/2, 43–47. Kazan, Russia: Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University» (FSAEI of HE «K(VR)FU») (In Russian)

McLuhan, M. (2007). Ponimanie media: vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man]. G. Je. Kuchkov (ed.). V. Nikolaev (trans. from Eng.). Mocow – Zhukovskij: Giperboreja; Kuchkovo pole. (In Russian)

Sgibova, A. Yu. (2014). «Posetitel muzeya» i problemy formirovaniya muzeynoy deyatelnosti [«Museum visitor» and museum affairs establishment issues]. Tsennosti i smyislyi, 3(31), 120-131. Moscow: OOO «MasterPrint» (In Russian)

Shmit, F. I. (1929). Muzeynoe delo. Voprosyi ekspozitsii. [Museum business. Exposition issues]. Leningrad: Academia.

Soshnikova, A. O. (2012). Sotsіokulturnyi kontekst muzeynoyi komunikatsiyi [Sociocultural context of museum communication] [Text]: author’s ref. dis. cand. philos. Sciences: 09.00.04. Kharkiv: Khark. nats. un-t im. V. N. Karazina. (In Ukrainian)

PDF (Ukrainian)

Published: November 19, 2020.

Vol 19 No 1 (2021).

Section: MUSEOLOGY AND PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE.