UDC 316:303.446.2:130.2
Ihor Yudkin
Institute for Cultural Research, National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv
ORCID 0000-0002-4616-302X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-17-2020-1.8-18
Keywords: epoch, episode, possible worlds, totality, eidetic doctrine, cyclic construction, intention.
Abstract. The logics of intuitionism, which has been elaborated on the premises of phenomenology as an alternative to the formal logics, reveals common features with eidetic reduction while making up preconditions for the formation of eidetic images. It is the relation “part — whole” that becomes the foundation of intuition being common with totallogy in philosophy and meronymy in linguistics. Here, in opposite to the elements of a class in formal logics, the parts are not indifferent but are rather different in function beforehand while determining the division of an object into closed cycles. The main means of intuition, i.e. the creation of cycles and the disclosure of manifold connections (“diagonalization”), conform to the properties of historical reality which is marked with totality and uniqueness and is represented as the “possible worlds” that are remote from immediate observation due to the historical distance. Of particular importance is such peculiarity of historical stuff as that of closed nature which imparts the property of a self-referential text to history. That evokes the problems of fatalism reflected in theatre as a “freedom — fate” dilemma. As to the theatrical interpretation of history, the scope of “episode — epoch” cycles plays here the important role where the transition is provided with the subject of action as the vehicle of intentionality. The intuition in theatrical interpretation works through the disclosure of manifold connections among separate episodes, in particular, through the searches of the prototypes of dramatis personae. The epoch’s subject of action is reconstructed in theatre as the vehicle of intentionality. Episodes correspond with the epoch as a whole in the eidetic image of an epoch.
Author Biography.
Ihor Yudkin, Doctor of art studies, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, leading researcher, Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv.
dr.iyudkin@gmail.com
Referencеs:
Alpatov, V. M. (2018). Yazyk – sistema pravil i yazyk – deyatel’nost’. [Language as the System of Rules and Language as Activity]. Istoricheskaya psihologiya i sociologiya istorii. № 2. P. 202–220. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.30884/ipsi/2018.02.09
Babochkin, B. A. (1968). V teatre i kino [In the Theatre and in the Cinema]. Moscow: Vserossiiskoe Teatral’noe Obschestvo. 388 p. (In Russian)
Belza, I. F. (1953). Mocart i Sal’eri. Tragediya Pushkina. Dramaticheskie sceny Rimskogo-Korsakova [Mozart and Saglieri. Puskin’s Tragedy. Rimski-Korsakov’s Dramatic Scenes]. Moscow: Muzgiz. 136 p. (In Russian)
Bulgakov, S. N. (1994). Svet nevechernii [The Light not of Evening]. Moscow: Respublika. 416 p. (In Russian)
Bulgakov, S. N. (1991). Pravoslavie. Ocherki ucheniya pravoslavnoi cerkvi. [Orthodoxy. Essays on the Doctrine of the Orthodox Church]. Kyiv: Lybid’. 236 p. (In Russian)
Durilіn, S. M. (1955). Mariia Zankovetska. 1860–1934 [Maria Zankovetska. 1860–1934]. Zhyttia i tvorchist. Kyiv: Mistectvo. 520 p. (In Ukrainian)
Eliade, M. (1987). Kosmos i istoriya [Cosmos and History]. Translation from French and English Vasileva, A. A., Rokityanskii, V. R., & Borisova, E. G. (Ed.) Grigulevicha, I.R., & Gasparova, M. L. Moscow: Progress. 312 p. (In Russian)
Ferster, N. P. (1929). Vzaimootnoshenie zritel’nogo i dvigatel’nogo momentov pri vospriyatii prostranstvennyh form [The Interrelationship between Visual and Kinesthetic Moments at the Perception of Spatial Forms]. Trudy Gosudarstvennoi Akademii Hudojestvennyh Nauk. Laboratoriya eksperimental’noi estetiki i iskusstvovedeniya. Issue 2. P. 7– 44. (In Russian)
Goran, V. P. (1990). Drevnegrecheskaya mifologema sud’by. [The Mythologeme of fate in Ancient Greece]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 336 p. (In Russian)
Gulyga, A. V. (1969). Istoriya kak nauka [History as Science]. Filosofskie problemy istoricheskoi nauki. Moscow: Nauka. P. 7–50. (In Russian)
Kizima, V. V. (2016). Sizigiya kak suschnost’ bytiya. [Syzygy as the Essence of Existence]. Totallogy – XXI. Postneklasichnі doslіdjennya. No 33. P. 7–54. (In Russian)
Knebel, M. O. (1984). Poeziya pedagogiki [The Poetry of Pedagogic]. 2nd edition. Moscow: Vserossiiskoe teatral’noe obschestvo. 528 p. (In Russian)
Lissauer, E. (1920). Der inwendige Weg. Jena: Diederichs. 120 p.
Luriya, A. R. (1971). Psihologiya kak istoricheskaya nauka [Psychology as a Historical Science]. Istoriya i psihologiya. Moscow: Nauka. P. 36 – 62. (In Russian)
Lvov-Anohin, B. A. (1959). Amvrosii Maksimilianovich Buchma. 1891–1957. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 186 p. (In Russian)
Maryanenko, І. O. (1964). Scena. Aktori. Rolі [Scene. Actors. Roles]. Kyiv: Mistectvo. (In Ukrainian)
Moore, A. W. (1984). Possible Worlds and Diagonalization. Analysis. V. 44. P. 21–22.
Nechkina, M. V. (1982). Funkciya hudojestvennogo obraza v istoricheskom processe [The Function of an Artistic Image within the Historical Process]. Moscow: Nauka (AN SSSR. Otdelenie istorii). 322 p. (In Russian)
Podkorytov, G. A. (1988). O prirode nauchnogo metoda [On the Nature of Scientific Method]. Leningrad: Izdatelstvo Leningradskogo universiteta. 224 p. (In Russian)
Podkorytov, G. A., & Alyabeva, Z. S. (2016). Unikal’noe v mire prirody i cheloveka. Sbornik nauchnyh i literaturno-hudojestvennyh miniatyur [The Uniqueness in the World of Nature and Man. A Collection of Scientific and Literary Miniatures]. St. Petersburg: Himizdat. 320 p. (In Russian)
Porshnev, B. F. (1969). O nachale chelovecheskoi istorii. [On the Origins of Human History]. Filosofskie problemy istoricheskoi nauki. Moscow: Nauka. P. 80–112. (In Russian)
Rakitov, A. I. (1969). K voprosu o strukture istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Towards the Question on the Nature of Historical Researches]. Filosofskie problemy istoricheskoi nauki. Moscow: Nauka. P. 161–185. (In Russian)
Shteinpress, B. S. (1980). Ocherki i etyudy [Essays and Notes]. Moscow: Sovetskii kompozitor. 352 p. (In Russian)
Sidorchuk, I. V. (2015). Celi i perspektivy istorii dosuga [The Purpose and Perspectives of the History of Leisure]. Istoricheskaya psihologiya i sociologiya istorii.No 2. P. 174–286. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18411/spc-01-12-2017-04
Skryabin, S. S. (1929). Eksperimental’noe issledovanie processa abstrakcii v svyazi s vospriyatiem formy [An Experimental Investigation of the process of Abstractionwith the Question of Form’s Perception]. Trudy Gosudarstvennoi Akademii Hudojestvennyh Nauk. Laboratoriya eksperimental’noi estetiki i iskusstvovedeniya. Issue 2. P. 45–87. (In Russian)
Vanіna, І. G. (1964). Ukrainska shekspiriana [The Ukrainian Shakespearean Tradition]. Kyiv: Mistectvo. 204 p. (In Ukrainian)
Vinogradskaya, I. N. (1976). Jizn’ i tvorchestvo K.S, Stanislavskogo. Letopis’. T. 4. 1927–1938. [The Life and Creative Work of K.S. Stanislavski. The Annals. V. 4. 1927 – 1938]. Moscow: Vserossiiskoe Teatral’noe Obschestvo. 584 p. (In Russian)
Yudkіn, І. M. (2019). Fenomenologіya yak metodologіya іstorichnoї poetiki [Phenomenology as the Methodology of Historical Poetics]. The Culturology Ideas. No 17. P. 20–35. (In Ukrainian)
Published: March 10, 2020.
Section: THEORY AND HISTORY OF CULTURE.