UDC 316.663.2/.772.5 (045)
Institute for Cultural Research, National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv
Keywords: the screen space, the role, the society, the social role.
Abstract. The aim of this paper is to analyze maintenance, essence and types of roles of a man formed within the limits of virtual screen space. These scientific searches seem actual as a role-play behaviour of a man in the real society and newly changed virtual reality differs substantially, that, in turn, influences on the evolution of modern culture and art processes of a modern state.
Results. The paper shows that the rich in the content constituent of virtual screen space formed exceptionally at the active voice of man effects on the processes of one’s personal authentication.
The paper clarifies that for the purposes of this research, it has considered more generally as a set of self-manifesting displays of the self, depending on the needs, interests and individual characteristics of a particular person.
Novelty. The author argued that the following criteria should be taken into account when forming a typology of a person’s social roles within the virtual screen space: the purpose that the person pursues; one’s own assessment of self, one’s capabilities and achievements; those forms of interpersonal interaction that one chooses over the Internet.
Maryna Mishchenko, Ph.D. in Law, Institute for Cultural Research, National Academy of Arts of Ukraine, Kyiv/
Bilodid, I. K. (Ed.). (1977). Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language]. In 11 vol. Vol. 8, p. 876. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. (in Ukrainian)
Chmil, Hanna & Korablova, Nadiia. (2013). Vizualizatsiia realnoho v suchasnomu kulturnomu prostori: monohrafiia [Visualization of the Real in the Modern Cultural Space]. Kyiv: The Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)
Fromm, E. (1992). Chelovek dlia sebia [Man for Himself. An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics]. Translated from English and afterword by L. A. Chernyshova. Minsk: Kollegium. (in Russian)
Gornostai, P.P. (2007). Lichnost i rol: rolevoi podkhod v sotsialnoi psikhologii lichnosti [The Personality and Role. Role-based Approach in Social Psychology of Personality]. Kiev: Interpress LTD. (in Russian)
Linton, Ralph. (1936). The study of man. New York: APPELTON-CENTURY-CROFTS INC.
Mishchenko, M. O. (2018). Plahiat yak nevid’iemna skladova zaluchennia liudyny do ekrannoho prostoru [Plagiarism as an Independent Constituent of the Human Attraction to the Screen Space]. The Culturology Ideas, (13), pp. 132–138. (in Ukrainian)
Mykhailenko, O. Yu. (2013). Rolovyi pidkhid do vyvchennia osobystosti [Role-based Approach to the Study of Personality]. Collection of Research Papers of Problems of Modern Psychology, (21), pp. 426–435. (in Ukrainian)
Naidonov, Oleksandr. (2019). Ekranna kultura merezhevoho suspilstva: vynyknennia, zmist, tsinnosti, smysly [Screen Culture of Network Society: Genesis, Contents, Values, Purport]. Visnyk of the Lviv university. Philosophical Political studies, (23), pp. 66–73. (in Ukrainian)
Parsons, T. (1996). Ponjatie obshhestva: komponenty i ih vzaimootnoshenie. [The Concept of Society: The Components and Their Interrrelations]. Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya mysl. Moscow, pp. 494–526. (in Russian)
Sartre, Jean-Paul. (2000). Bytie i nichto: Opyt fenomenologicheskoi ontologii [L’être et le néant: Essay d’ontologie phénoménologique]. Translated by V. I. Koljadko. Moscow: Respublika. (in Russian)
Toffler, A. (2002). Shok budushchego [Future Shock]. Translated from English. Moscow: OOO «Izdatelstvo ACT». (in Russian)
Published: December 2, 2019.
Section: THEORY AND HISTORY OF CULTURE.